Did Henry VIII really believe Anne Boleyn was guilty as charged?

--

I’ve always been keen to meet other super-cool Royal history geeks.  That’s one of the reasons I started this blog.  I’m pleased to say that my desires are already being achieved.  Within two days of go-live, I found myself in an interesting Twitter conversation with ‏@HistoryGal_ and @charlotteshist on whether Henry VIII believed that Anne Boleyn was guilty of the crimes – adultery, incest and treason – for which she was ultimately put to death.

It’s a subject I want to explore in much greater depth.  Indeed, I intend to write an extensive series on Anne’s ‘guilt’ when time allows.  But for now, I wanted to take the moment to put down some #QuickFireThoughts.  I write largely in ignorance but, perhaps this will provoke conversations that will in turn educate me.

For what it’s worth, I think in his heart of hearts, Henry knew Anne was innocent.  Here’s why:

  • I do not currently subscribe to the theory that a) Anne was actually guilty as charged or that, b) her downfall was primarily a sabotage initiated by Cromwell. I believe that Henry was actually the main orchestrator of it, even if only tacitly.
  • Henry wanted rid of Anne. True it had only been a few years since he had risked everything to marry her, but we all know that highs can descend to lows very quickly.  Not only was she massively getting on his wick but, she had of course failed to bear him a son which had been one of the main attractions to him seeking a second marriage.
  • The execution of Anne Boleyn was a political possibility. Unlike Catherine of Aragon, she was not protected by a mighty Emperor beyond the seas.  All he needed was a valid legal pretence.
  • Such an act was in keeping with Henry’s character. He had convinced himself that he was sinning against God by being married to Catherine, something that plainly hadn’t bothered him for the early part of his marriage.  He was a man who was very easily able to persuade himself of his own lies.  That’s how he could justify some of his heinous actions!

Like I say, far more research needs to be done, and I would very much like to hear other people’s thoughts…

Posted in <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/quickfirethoughts/" rel="category tag">#QuickFireThoughts</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/anne-boleyn/" rel="category tag">Anne Boleyn</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/henry-viii/" rel="category tag">Henry VIII</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/tudor/" rel="category tag">Tudor</a> Tagged <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/tag/anne-boleyn/" rel="tag">Anne Boleyn</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/tag/henry-viii/" rel="tag">Henry VIII</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/tag/tudors/" rel="tag">Tudors</a> 5 Comments

Book review: David Starkey – Elizabeth: Apprenticeship

Elizabeth apprentecship

Everyone knows the epic stories of Elizabeth I.  The lioness who secured the greatest English military victory since Agincourt; the woman who struggled to put her plotting cousin to death; the iconic matriarch who would achieve cult status in her own lifetime but leave behind no child to secure her legacy.

But little did I know how it was probably the earliest years of her life that were for her personally, by far the most dramatic.  Thanks to this excellent biography by David Starkey, my eyes were opened.

The story – for indeed it reads with the ease of a story book without any compromising of detail – begins with Elizabeth’s birth and a sense of disappointment.  She was supposed to be a boy – no one had use for a princess.  And throughout the book there is a sense that for the first 25 years of her life she is a person who never quite fits in and is something of an inconvenience for everyone: the royal bastard with questionable status; the step-daughter who endangers her guardian’s marriage; the heir-presumptive who is stubbornly the wrong religion.

David Starkey cleverly illustrates how these early struggles shape the character that would one day emerge as the great Gloriana.  A calculated strategist who knew how to adapt and survive and a pragmatist that was never wedded to philosophy or ideology.

From the fall-out of the Seymour affair to plots made against her sister in Elizabeth’s name, Starkey paints the picture of danger that Elizabeth lived through and creates a raw sense of just how many bullets she had to dodge.  Despite actually knowing how the story ends, such is the power of storytelling that there are moments when you anxiously wonder whether the auburn-haired Princess is ever going to make it to the throne.

Elizabeth’s early relationships are also fascinating – her mixed intimacy with her sibling, her fierce loyalty to the servants that raised her, her early encounter with sexuality.  The author brings each of these to life with colour and zest.  Finally the book concludes with Elizabeth’s ascension – something that even then seems less like a great victory and more like the next phase of insecurity.

This is not the only book to devote itself to Elizabeth’s early life; but it is probably the most detailed.  It is therefore a must read not just to fans of the Virgin Queen, but to anyone who seeks insight into this phase of the Tudor period.  Above all else is a shrewd analysis of the psychology behind the early experiences that shape the character of a woman who is generally judged by history to have been one of that era’s greatest rulers.

Elizabeth: Apprenticeship, by Dr David Starkey was published by Vintage in 2001.  At time of writing, it was available for purchase from Amazon in hardcover (£20.00) and paperback (£13.10)

Posted in <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/book-review/" rel="category tag">Book review</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/elizabeth-i/" rel="category tag">Elizabeth I</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/tudor/" rel="category tag">Tudor</a> 1 Comment

Richard III part 7: Conclusion

In the past six posts I have attempted to demonstrate why I believe the circumstantial evidence and other reliable sources point firmly to the blame of Richard III who usurped his throne and killed his nephews.  Now I will sum up my conclusions and look forward to the conversation that will follow. Continue reading

Posted in <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/thoroughlyresearched/" rel="category tag">#ThoroughlyResearched</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/edward-iv/" rel="category tag">Edward IV</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/edward-v/" rel="category tag">Edward V</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/henry-vii/" rel="category tag">Henry VII</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/plantagenet/" rel="category tag">Plantagenet</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/richard-iii/" rel="category tag">Richard III</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/tudor/" rel="category tag">Tudor</a> Leave a comment

Richard III part 6: Two issues that made me think twice…

Early in my research, I started to form the view that Richard III was responsible for the death of his nephews.  However, during my journey I stumbled across a couple of road blocks that gave me more than a little pause for thought. Continue reading

Posted in <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/thoroughlyresearched/" rel="category tag">#ThoroughlyResearched</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/edward-v/" rel="category tag">Edward V</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/elizabeth-of-york/" rel="category tag">Elizabeth of York</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/elizabeth-woodville/" rel="category tag">Elizabeth Woodville</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/henry-vii/" rel="category tag">Henry VII</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/plantagenet/" rel="category tag">Plantagenet</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/princes-in-the-tower/" rel="category tag">Princes in the Tower</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/richard-iii/" rel="category tag">Richard III</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/tudor/" rel="category tag">Tudor</a> Leave a comment

Richard III part 5: MORE of less – can we trust Thomas More’s account?

The most detailed account of Richard III’s murder of the Princes in the Tower was penned by lawyer and philosopher Thomas More c. 1515.  But can his ‘History of Richard III’ be trusted and respected as a credible piece of historical research and writing? Continue reading

Posted in <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/thoroughlyresearched/" rel="category tag">#ThoroughlyResearched</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/edward-iv/" rel="category tag">Edward IV</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/edward-v/" rel="category tag">Edward V</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/henry-vii/" rel="category tag">Henry VII</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/plantagenet/" rel="category tag">Plantagenet</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/princes-in-the-tower/" rel="category tag">Princes in the Tower</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/richard-iii/" rel="category tag">Richard III</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/tudor/" rel="category tag">Tudor</a> Tagged <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/tag/plantagenet/" rel="tag">Plantagenet</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/tag/princes-in-the-tower/" rel="tag">Princes in the Tower</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/tag/richard-iii/" rel="tag">Richard III</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/tag/thomas-more/" rel="tag">Thomas More</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/tag/tudor/" rel="tag">Tudor</a> Leave a comment

Richard III part 4: Alternative theories – who else could have been responsible for the death (or rescue) of the Princes in the Tower?

In the last blog post, I demonstrated that circumstantial evidence strongly points toward Richard’s guilt; who else could really have overcome his defences and murdered the closely guarded Princes?  Nonetheless the centuries that followed have spawned countless alternative theories, some of which are worthy of examination.

Continue reading

Posted in <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/thoroughlyresearched/" rel="category tag">#ThoroughlyResearched</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/beaufort/" rel="category tag">Beaufort</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/edward-v/" rel="category tag">Edward V</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/henry-vii/" rel="category tag">Henry VII</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/margaret-beaufort/" rel="category tag">Margaret Beaufort</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/plantagenet/" rel="category tag">Plantagenet</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/princes-in-the-tower/" rel="category tag">Princes in the Tower</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/richard-iii/" rel="category tag">Richard III</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/category/tudor/" rel="category tag">Tudor</a> Tagged <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/tag/princes-in-the-tower/" rel="tag">Princes in the Tower</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/tag/richard-iii/" rel="tag">Richard III</a>, <a href="https://www.royalhistorygeeks.com/tag/tudor/" rel="tag">Tudor</a> 4 Comments